Author: Howard Exner
Date: 12:21:02 07/26/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 26, 1998 at 09:51:13, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On July 26, 1998 at 09:20:22, SEAN EVANS wrote: > >>The "Twelve (12) Year Old Child" writes, >> >>Let's face it, we know humans cannot beat Micros on fast time controls! >> >>We do know that Anand won the *real* match on long time controls as follows; >> >>Anand 1.5 >> >>Rebel 0.5 > >5-3 in total. This was the match. 8 games: 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 > >Or else, your way of counting (quoting an admirable reply from Howard Exner): >"Teacher: OK children, today we are going to learn how to count. Repeat after >me, 1 2 5 4 3 6 7 ..." I'm glad to see someone picked on my not so subtle sarcasm from Ed's chat page. I was replying to a poster who used the name Jan. That poster said almost the identical thing here, but concluded the post with, "Anyone who says Rebel won the match 5-3 is a fool!" Thus my reply, >"Teacher: OK children, today we are going to learn how to count. Repeat after >me, 1 2 5 4 3 6 7 ..." Did you notice the counter reply by a poster using the the name, Bernd. I was pronounced a MORON !!! But the poster also asked me to explain what my post meant. I'm thinking to myself, why would anyone ask a MORON to explain something, unless ... ? > >Enrique > >>Yes that is correct Anand *beat* Rebel rather soundly, looks like Rebel is a >>*long* way from being the micro Grandmaster. >> >>The fast time controls were just played so Shroeder could claim a victory for >>his "crappy" DOS platform program, to increase his sales. If all the games had >>been on long time controls I do not believe Rebel would have won a single game. >> >>Your friend in Computer Chess, >> >>The Apostle Sean
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.