Author: Eric Baum
Date: 05:23:35 05/20/02
How much do modern programs benefit from developments beyond alpha-beta search +quiesence search? So, if you did the same depth search, same quiesence search, same opening book, same endgame tables, but replaced the evaluation function with something primitive-- say material and not much else-- how many rating points would you lose? My recollection is that one of the Deep Thought thesis showed a minimal gain for Deep Thought from extensive training of evaluation function-- it gained some tens of rating points, but less than it would have gained from a ply of additional search. Has that changed?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.