Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: when tablebases cause blunders

Author: Tony Werten

Date: 06:40:58 05/29/02

Go up one level in this thread


On May 29, 2002 at 09:37:20, Harald Faber wrote:

>On May 29, 2002 at 02:34:34, Robin Smith wrote:
>
>>The position is easily winning for white.  But tablebases cause programs to want
>>to play 1.Rxf5?? after which there is a tablebase mate in 65 .... except the 50
>>move rule kicks in first and the game ends up a draw.  Are there any programs
>>that avoid this type of blunder?  [D] 5k2/3K4/8/R4b2/1R6/8/3B4/5r2 w - - 0 1
>
>Sorry, I don't get the point here. I don't see '??' after 1.Rxf5 when the
>exchange leads to #65. And concerning the 50 move rule: There are several
>exceptions which allow more than 50 moves to mate. Your example with KRB<->KR is
>one of the exceptions IIRC.

Not anymore. All the exceptions have been discarded. 50 move rule is as it was
before tablebases questioned it. So this checkmate in 65 is a draw.

BTW XiniX says Kd6 solves the problem.

Tony



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.