Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 05:33:52 05/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2002 at 01:23:35, Slater Wold wrote: >On May 29, 2002 at 20:34:37, Scott Gasch wrote: > >>On May 29, 2002 at 19:50:20, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >> >>>On May 29, 2002 at 18:39:03, Scott Gasch wrote: >>> >>>>I've been gently informed that I'm not supposed to talk about the speed of >>>>not-released processors, sorry about that. >>>> >>>>Scott >>> >>>I have to admit I realized you were unwittingly violating an NDA, but my >>>curiosity got the better of me. I should have told you straight off what you >>>were disclosing might get you in trouble. My apologies. >> >>No apologies needed, it's my own stupidity at fault here. For the record I'm >>not in any trouble. I self-censored when it was pointed out to me that I could >>possibly get into trouble with this. >> >>Scott > >Well hell, now you got us all curious. Now I wanna know what was said. ;) Well i got info from deep throat lucky. Other source in this case. This source confirms that for 64 bits applications like crafty the i2 is very fast. 1.5 million nodes a second is not bad. your bench you posted here at 2.53Ghz P4 was like 950k a second or so? that's of course major victory for intel getting 1.5 MLN nodes a second on a 1Ghz processor.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.