Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 13:45:53 06/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 06, 2002 at 16:25:01, Michael Vox wrote: >On June 06, 2002 at 10:10:12, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >When Nalimov 32 piece tbs come out someday, it will be over. This will >eventually happen with stronger hardware. At least every worthy line will be >saved to dbases. It will no longer be Crafty vs Junior, it will be Crafty dbase >vs Junior dbase. > >No point in discussing computer chess anymore once this level of technology and >dbases is hit. That's why I would advise a new definition of computerchess. 'Away from (just) reading in dbases and back to the knowledge and calculating of the engine on'. I would support a clear difference between the features of a machine as tournament chessplayer or as training tool for human chessplayers. (As a repetition from my earlier statements I think it is important to understand that in tournaments dbases or books are no obstacle for the top GM, simply because of their eidetics. A second point is result of my thought experiment that after the creative invention of real anti-computer-chess chess against machines even with dbases would be much easier for humans down to expert level. A third mention was the unfair and forbidden usage of dbases in FIDE rules.) Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.