Author: Pham Minh Tri
Date: 20:19:02 06/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2002 at 15:07:25, Dann Corbit wrote: >On June 13, 2002 at 14:45:06, stuart taylor wrote: >[snip] >I think Uri has taken a very wise approach. He spent a great deal of time >optimizing a move generator. This is the heart of a chess program. A program >that has everything else excellent, but an average move generator can become >strong but not a superstar, because it will become a bottleneck at some point. [snip] > >However, I think Uri's approach is a very sound one. Start with a solid >foundation and build upon that. Take incremental steps towards a goal. Since >he is also an excellent chess player, I expect that he can insert special >knowledge into his program and know when it is doing something awful (not always >as easy as it sounds for us patzers). Do you suggest and encourage newbies spend their first few years on move generators only?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.