Author: Bas Hamstra
Date: 06:36:18 06/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
>>>If you are right then this means that the pro's are not very good and have >>>not a big advantage relative to the amatuers. >>It *is* very good to outsearch the competition nearly a ply, other things >>equal. I don't know why you do not appreciate that. You think it's easy to >>get there? > >I expect the difference between professional and amatuers to be bigger. All we have to do is test it. A match Yace (4 x speed) against GT with enough games to determine which one is stronger with 95% confidence. Would that convince you? >Kasparov is going to beat every player that is not a GM when you give kasparov >half of the time or every 2 no GM players in a simultan. You should understand >that when the difference between my program and the best amatuers is more than >factor of 2 I do not consider factor of 2 as a lot. A factor 2 is not much *because* the difference between Movei and the best amateurs is more than factor 2? Hm, have to think that one over :-/ Best regards, Bas.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.