Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 15:10:43 06/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 17, 2002 at 16:16:47, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On June 17, 2002 at 15:02:34, Torstein Hall wrote: > >>I do not belive you have any reason to call them prejudiced because they did not >>test Virtual Chess. So I think your prejudice showed up in your choice of that >>word. But I will offer my excuse anyway, nothing good comes from name calling! > > >a prejudice is when you say something without having experienced facts/data. > >when you say a chess program is weak, so we don't test it, >this is a prejudice. > >if you call me prejudice because i call this prejudice, this is IMO >nonsense. > >because i have tested virtual chess and i have manually played many games. >i put virtual in my tournaments and i know it was a strong program. >others feel or know this too. > >so WE played out data. how can we be prejudiced ??? > >prejudiced is somebody saying something without knowing. >thats the definition. > >i have virtual dos and windows here. i used it. I have never heard SSDF say Virtual Chess is weak. And why should they say so if they not have tested it? > > > >>We both know that there is a lot of work to play manual games if you want to use >>statistics in the way SDSF do, and a program with no autoplay function is not >>very likely to be tested. > > >we know that it is much work. but they tested other programs without >auto232 . They havent done a lot of that in the last years. And I understand them quite well. > >>But I'm sure they would welcome you into their >>society, > > >wrong. >the ssdf do only accept swedish guys. another problem. a kind of >testing racism :-)) It used to be open for Norwegians in the old days, but perhaps its because we understand Swedish. Or perhaps they have changed their rules? Torstein > > > >> specially if you cared to play 50 to 100 games with Virtual chess >>manually.... :-) > >i would say it is a little to late for virtual. >the program is OLD now. > >>Best regards and many excuses >>Torstein > >no problem torstein. >everything is IMO within green area. >no excuses or apologizes. >i can stand more than named prejudiced.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.