Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 16:52:58 08/02/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 02, 1998 at 14:00:35, blass uri wrote: > >On August 02, 1998 at 09:49:34, Robert Hyatt wrote: > > > >>Fritz is ideally suited to play other computers. Very fast, very deep. But >>I'd expect it to do worse than some other programs against a group of GM >>players. Anand was an example. Shredded Fritz trivially, had to work to beat >>Rebel in the two slow games. Yet I'm sure that fritz will beat Rebel in a >>match, as has been seen on SSDF. > >How can you be sure Fritz5 will beat Rebel10 in a match? >We know Fritz5 beated Rebel9 but Rebel10 is stronger than Rebel9. > >Uri I'm not, and I didn't say "Rebel 10" notice. I assume that Ed is doing his normal tst games against fritz, albiet manually, so that rebel 10 will be able to beat fritz 5. Then I'd suspect that the ChessBase folks do the same and fritz 6 will be back in the driver's seat again... That's been a "trend" for a couple of years with the commercial chess programs... Last one out is *always* the best...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.