Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: 16x16 boards. Can anyone explain?

Author: Dieter Buerssner

Date: 07:14:21 06/20/02

Go up one level in this thread

On June 20, 2002 at 06:27:56, Dan Andersson wrote:

>You don't need to make a memory lookup in the 8x16 or the16x16 board. Thats one
>of the gains.

Yep. But it also needs larger (and possibly less cache efficient) tables, for
example piece square tables for evaluation. Or some "translation array" at this
point. For typical board size tables, this may be no problem. More costly it
will be for a history table.

Regards,
Dieter

• Re: 16x16 boards. Can anyone explain? Tony Werten 08:10:17 06/20/02
  • Re: 16x16 boards. Can anyone explain? Bas Hamstra 14:57:05 06/20/02
    • Re: 16x16 boards. Can anyone explain? Tony Werten 01:02:29 06/21/02
    • Re: 16x16 boards. Can anyone explain? Tony Werten 00:13:52 06/21/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.