Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 13:27:03 06/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 20, 2002 at 16:14:28, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On June 20, 2002 at 16:08:11, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>We've got a bushel basket of 64 bit machines here, but I am too lazy to fool >>around with them. Some of them are basically paperweights (not even plugged in >>most of the time). Others are pretty active (The IBM and Alpha machines). >> >>We have Silicon Graphics and HP and all sorts of stuff like that. The older >>machines don't really impress me much. I did a few experiments some time back >>to see how they would perform with chess programs and they don't really knock my >>socks off. Slow clock rate. > >Doesn't matter how fast they are when you're looking for relative performance >measurements. Do the man pages for any of the compilers say anything about >producing backwards-compatible (32-bit) code? Don't know. For some of them, all we have is GCC.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.