Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Quest??? Identical to Fritz?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 12:10:09 06/21/02

Go up one level in this thread


On June 21, 2002 at 13:18:55, Randall Jouett wrote:

>Howdy, GCP.
>
>
>On June 21, 2002 at 09:54:18, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>
>>On June 21, 2002 at 07:45:56, Robert Henry Durrett wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Is there anything at all about Quest which is different from the commercial
>>>version of Fritz 7?
>>
>>The idea is that if Quest/Fritz wins the tournament, ChessBase can say
>>Fritz won. If it loses, they will say it was Quest.
>
>OTOH, I guess you couldn't really blame them for doing this, I guess?
>(Shrug.) In other words, let's say that they decided to try some new,
>radical idea that might actually add 25-50 ELO points, but they're
>not really sure if things are going to work out in the long run. If
>Fritz would lose, its reputation would probably be tarnished by the
>ignorant public. Personally, I wouldn't wouldn't think this way,
>and I'm sure most of us who here would agree. OTOH, they're
>dealing with the general public here, and if Fritz placed 3rd out of
>the pack, then the public probably be all up in arms -- shouting from
>the rafters! -- that some other program bested the mighty Fritz.
>
>
>IMHO, I think should have entered the latest, greatest commerically-available
>Fritz and maybe an experimental version of the program, calling it
>something like thing "Fritz Experimental" or something. If the experimental
>version of the program fails to work out, then they really haven't lost
>all that much on their reputation. I mean, from what reading here,
>I'm sure that most people following the tournament are going to know
>(in the long run) that Quest is probably an experimental Fritz. Changing
>the name of the program from Fritz to Quest, IMHO, kind of makes them
>look guilty, as if they had something to hide.
>
>
>Best Regards,
>
>Randall


Call a spade a spade.  It is a marketing ploy designed to mislead John Q.
public.  Nothing more.  Nothing less.  It is a way to exploit success while
avoiding looking bad when the predictable bad result happens.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.