Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: News about intel multi-processor hardware

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 19:45:12 06/24/02

Go up one level in this thread


On June 24, 2002 at 04:12:29, Bernhard Bauer wrote:

>On June 23, 2002 at 20:18:30, Sean Mintz wrote:
>
>>Its been rumored to use bitboards. If ported correctly, then yes it would run
>>faster. Possibly significantly faster.
>
>Why should it run faster?
>It's not clear, at least to me, why a smp program should run faster on
>16 procs than on 8 procs.
>It may double the nps but not necessarily find a good move earlier.
>Please note that SMP is not a massive parallel system.
>SMP is limited.
>Kind regards
>Bernhard


I don't understand the "SMP is limited".  If you mean "number of processors"
then that is partially true, although I should point out that there are many
32-processor SMP systems around, starting at the mighty Cray T932 at the top
of the food chain...

As far as running faster, all I can say is mine definitely does run faster.
Every processor will make the search time drop a bit...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.