Author: pavel
Date: 05:09:52 07/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 11, 2002 at 05:49:38, Coxwell Strange wrote: > It is readily agreed that nps are not a very good guide for strength >comparisons of different programs. However, nps do not directly translate to >depth/time. Depth/time is not necessarily useful when comparing different >programs, but usually is with the same general programs. With a program that >displays nps, it has been seen that higher nps can be displayed with smaller >hash, but the smaller hash increases the time to depth, so in at least that >case, nps can be inversely related to time/depth. Your above statement just gave us the reason not to take your comments about CM seriously because you obviously don't make any sense. Read what Graham wrote, again. No point of testing something when you know the result. pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.