Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Chessmaster version test for Mr. John Merlino

Author: Coxwell Strange

Date: 14:55:58 07/12/02

Go up one level in this thread

Thanks for clearing that up for me.
    Let's see I have this straight now...
1. selective search does little but reduce time to depth, so we dont need that
and can use brute search.
2. hash does little more than reduce time to depth, so we can use the least
possible.
3. CPU does little but reduce time to depth, so.. we only need a 200mz,not a 2gz
4. All of those "others" must be the guys all over the internet with their
Chessmaster8000s, on PC200s, doing brute searches, and licking the crap out of
tiger, fritz and all the others... :)... thx again for the thorough education of
strength and computer chess.

• Re: Chessmaster version test for Mr. John Merlino John Merlino 15:19:20 07/12/02
  • Re: Chessmaster version test for Mr. John Merlino Coxwell Strange 16:15:10 07/12/02
    • Re: Chessmaster version test for Mr. John Merlino John Merlino 13:48:22 07/13/02
    • Re: Chessmaster version test for Mr. John Merlino Kurt Utzinger 08:47:40 07/13/02
      • Re: Chessmaster version test for Mr. John Merlino Coxwell Strange 16:52:25 07/13/02
        • Re: Chessmaster version test for Mr. John Merlino Kurt Utzinger 22:55:39 07/13/02
      • Re: Chessmaster version test for Mr. John Merlino Günther Simon 09:37:51 07/13/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.