Author: Mark Young
Date: 09:17:26 08/06/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 06, 1998 at 03:31:25, Kai Lübke wrote: >On August 05, 1998 at 16:19:18, Kim Hvarre wrote: > > >>Well, I too use it with Piltz (or wharever) settings, but it remains to be shown >>that it makes that a huge difference, and frankly I don't think it does. > >Louguet suite: improves score from 2430 to 2490 on my machine. > >In another tricky test position, it avoided the losing move played by the >default CM5500 after 10:00 by taking only 1:45 to find the good alternative. >There may be other examples, but I can't tell off-hand. > >--- >Shep I don't trust test positions, but everyone I have helped on ICC with CM has had their rating go up using what I know about CM. Which is close to your settings in CM5555. So I do think their is a big difference. Is my setting better then fritz 5. My testing says no. Is CM5555 setting better then fritz 5, My testing also says no. But it is close. So I do think it is possible for there to be some settings that my be better then Fritz 5 and all the rest. If CM6000 hits the market with a good opening book with learning and the engine is just a bit better then the old. CM6000 will be a powerhouse. But only testing will tell.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.