Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Null-Move: Difference between R = 2 and R = 3 in action

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 10:30:54 07/15/02

Go up one level in this thread

On July 15, 2002 at 13:11:09, Christophe Theron wrote:

>Why does double null move prove that null move is a correct search method????
>
>Doing two null moves in a row means going back to standard search (a search not
>involving an illegal move like null move is).
>
>I fail to see how it legitimates null move.

I think the idea is simply to show that you can nullmove and still
have a correct search. (but only with double nullmove, not single)

--
GCP

• Re: Null-Move: Difference between R = 2 and R = 3 in action Dann Corbit 13:00:52 07/15/02
  • Re: Null-Move: Difference between R = 2 and R = 3 in action Gian-Carlo Pascutto 13:09:57 07/15/02
    • Re: Null-Move: Difference between R = 2 and R = 3 in action Dann Corbit 13:19:32 07/15/02
      • Re: Null-Move: Difference between R = 2 and R = 3 in action Gian-Carlo Pascutto 13:43:39 07/15/02
        • Re: Null-Move: Difference between R = 2 and R = 3 in action Dann Corbit 14:02:42 07/15/02
          • Re: Null-Move: Difference between R = 2 and R = 3 in action Dann Corbit 14:05:45 07/15/02
          • Re: Null-Move: Difference between R = 2 and R = 3 in action Gian-Carlo Pascutto 14:05:17 07/15/02
            • Re: Null-Move: Difference between R = 2 and R = 3 in action Dann Corbit 14:11:42 07/15/02
• Re: Null-Move: Difference between R = 2 and R = 3 in action Robert Hyatt 11:42:52 07/15/02
  • Re: Null-Move: Difference between R = 2 and R = 3 in action Uri Blass 12:45:16 07/15/02
  • Re: Null-Move: Difference between R = 2 and R = 3 in action Omid David 12:42:36 07/15/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.