Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Trashed plans... North American Open 2003.

Author: Chessfun

Date: 10:21:48 07/19/02

Go up one level in this thread


On July 19, 2002 at 09:30:48, Kevin Strickland wrote:

>On July 19, 2002 at 02:41:17, Russell Reagan wrote:
>
>>I am sorry to hear this news Kevin. I appreciate everything that you have done
>>already. You did a great job in getting people excited about computer chess in
>>North America. It is a shame that some people do these kinds of things because
>>1. We are on the internet and somehow that means we can all act like it's a 1st
>>grade free for all, and 2. That people are too immature or selfish or full of
>>pride or hate or whatever the reason is and find the need to do things like
>>this.
>>
>>You are a better man than I, since I would have just posted the emails here to
>>ruin the reputation of those who committed such hateful acts.
>>
>>I hope you don't leave, because not everyone here is bad. I guess it only takes
>>a few bad ones to ruin it all though.
>>
>>Russell
>
>I will not be leaving the CCC. That will not happen. I just will not spend
>almost a year of my time organizing an event just to have someone in the wood
>work trying to sabotage it.
>
>On a side note I will not post the emails here. That is not my style. But I will
>say that 75% of them came from out European counter-parts.
>
>Since I slept on what happened yesterday I have come to a few conclusions:
>
>1. People were just trying to push a few buttons.. trust me they did.
>2. Some European's do not want a _successful_ tournament here. I am sure you can
>easily see why. If we were to told a massive event here it would look bad that
>only 20 participants show up there.

>3. Maybe I should just continue and do what I want. Which is hold the event. I
>seem to have support from the University of Alberta game group. That surely will
>go a long way to not only having a venue for the event, but also in support to
>organize it.


You wrote "I have come to a few conclusions", is 3. A conclusion?.

Sarah.





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.