Author: Slater Wold
Date: 22:01:57 08/13/02
White(1): setboard 8/8/3pR1P1/2k5/8/1p1b4/7K/8 b - - 0 67 Black(1): go end-game phase clearing hash tables time surplus 0.00 time limit 3:00 (3:00) nss depth time score variation (1) starting thread 1 (4) 8-> 0.39 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> (3) 9 0.48 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> (4) 9-> 0.73 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> (3) 10 0.97 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> (4) 10-> 1.67 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> (3) 11 1.70 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> (4) 11-> 3.55 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> (3) 12 3.55 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> (4) 12-> 7.45 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> (3) 13 7.53 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> 13 21.12 ++ 1. ... b2!! 13-> 2:49 -0.38 1. ... b26 time=3:00 cpu=307% mat=1 n=242037717 fh=94% nps=1342k ext-> chk=29936339 cap=78644 pp=227271 1rep=1144737 mate=32723 predicted=0 nodes=242037717 evals=21110434 endgame tablebase-> probes done=239240 successful=53187 SMP-> split=778 stop=81 data=9/32 cpu=9:13 elap=3:00 Black(1): b2 time used: 3:00 #1 - You should see b2 wins pretty much immediatly. Sure, 21.12 seconds isn't bad, but imagine this on a PIII 600! -0.38 isn't very convincing either. #2 - What's up with 13-> 2:49 -0.38 1. ... b26 <//==- that? #3 - Any reason you can see why Crafty would take *forver* (even after this move) to see the win?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.