Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chess Programmers -- take note: M. N. J. van Kervinck's Master's The

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 11:51:56 08/21/02

Go up one level in this thread


On August 20, 2002 at 12:01:39, Sune Fischer wrote:

>On August 20, 2002 at 11:28:16, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>
>>On August 20, 2002 at 11:23:25, Tony Werten wrote:
>>
>>>Probably true, but it's exactly the (own) research I miss in this paper. It
>>>resembles more a collection of other peoples work. ( I've read quite a few )
>>>
>>>Nice for someone who wants to start writing a chess engine, but it has nothing
>>>to do with a thesis.
>>
>>It's my understanding that for a masters, the amount of own contributions
>>is allowed to be minimal. (Contrary to a PhD)
>
>I was told by my supervisor that my thesis sould be about 150 pages, of those
>about 50 can be 'old news'.
>They allow these 50 pages for background information, and for me to prove that I
>have actually read and understand the basic concepts for what the thesis is
>about. Also it is nice to give the reader some introduction into the field of
>your study (even physicists don't know everything about everything:).
>
>Then I'm allowed about 30 pages of graphs and data, the remaining 70 pages is
>expected to be original reasearch.
>
>I was not under the general impression this stardard is exceptionally high for a
>masters.

Your impression is wrong.  That's way over the top for a master's thesis -- in
computing science, in North America, anyway.  Perhaps your supervisor was
thinking of Ph.D. thesis requirements.

Dave





This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.