Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 19:28:35 08/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 14, 1998 at 22:01:03, Ed Schröder wrote: >>nobody tries to defame dirk. > >But you do! no. >>All i say is, and moritz and dirk have subscribed to this, that they work for >>chessBase. >And now you do it again! >Don't you get this? no. >You have done some testing for me in the past. You were a beta tester >for Rebel8 and Rebel9. Would that make you working for Rebel? Of course >not. But suppose people start saying that and also that because of that >you are not objective anymore about Rebel. people will say anyway that somebody is not objective. Thats the best you can say about somebody you don't know, talking about a programs they don't have, for reasons only they want to hide. It is always the same. I thought I would have given enough examples: Thorsten Saitek as long as niggemann was closely connected to hegener+glaser. Suddenly, when Mr.Winkler visited Niggemann, and I was a worker there, the "title" that was invented to defame you, suddenly becomes like a chivalrous title in the moment Eric Winkler enters the room... ALWAYS the opponent side will say you are biased. What else can they say ?!? >How would you feel then? >Upset no? I am used to those "statements" over the years. By "working" with so many people, I would be unobjective to almost anybody. cstal rebel hiarcs diogenes check check stobor shredder zarkov chesstiger ... I am not upset. You will always somebody claiming this. As long as company A has competitor B. >>How can one expect from somebody getting money from chessBase , to do >>research, if the autoplayer of chessBase is cheating or influencing the results ! ?!? > >See above for a mirror comparison. > >Get it now? > >- Ed -
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.