Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 02:25:17 09/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 01, 2002 at 00:18:00, Steffen Jakob wrote: >Hi, > >usually programmers don't post positions of their own games (except Vincent ;) >for good reasons. Yesterday I played a bullet (!) game at ICC in which I saced a >knight which won that game. After the game I wanted to find out if this was >correct. Usually this isn't the case. Fritz didn't consider my move, but after a >post mortem analysis (also with the help of Alex Kure) I think that Ng5+ leads >to the most convincing winning line in this positions. > >Please start your engines/brains, gentlemen! > >[D]r1b2r2/pp1p1p1k/1qn2Ppp/5p2/3p4/3B1N2/PPPQ1PPP/R3R1K1 w - - 0 1 > >Here is the analysis: > >[Event "ICC 1 0"] >[Site "Internet Chess Club"] >[Date "2002.08.31"] >[White "Yobes"] >[Black "N.N."] >[Result "1-0"] >[ICCResult "Black checkmated"] >[WhiteElo "1603"] >[BlackElo "1503"] >[Opening "Robatsch (modern) defense"] >[SetUp "1"] >[FEN "r1b2r2/pp1p1p1k/1qn2Ppp/5p2/3p4/3B1N2/PPPQ1PPP/R3R1K1 w - - 0 1"] >[Time "14:44:28"] >[TimeControl "60+0"] > >1. Ng5+ hxg5 (1... Kg8 2. Nxf7 Kxf7 (2... Rxf7 3. Qxh6 Qd8 4. Qxg6+ Kf8 5. Qh6+ >Kg8 6. Bc4 $18) 3. Qxh6 Rg8 4. Bc4+ $18) 2. Qxg5 Nb4 (2... Rh8 {This move was >played in the actual game.} 3. Qh4+ Kg8 4. >Re8#) (2... d5 3. Qh4+ Kg8 4. Qh6 $18) (2... Nd8 3. Bxf5 Ne6 4. Qh4+ Kg8 5. Qh6 >$18) (2... Qd8 3. Bxf5 Rh8 4. Re4 Kg8 5. Bxg6 $18) 3. Re5 { >The threat is Qh4+ Kg8 Rxf5.} Nxd3 (3... d5 4. Bxf5 Bxf5 5. Qh4+ Kg8 6. Rxf5 >$18) 4. Qh4+ Kg8 5. Rxf5 Nc5 6. Rh5 $18 1-0 > >Greetings, >Steffen. Hiarcs8 needs about 10 minutes on my notebook. New game r1b2r2/pp1p1p1k/1qn2Ppp/5p2/3p4/3B1N2/PPPQ1PPP/R3R1K1 w - - 0 1 Analysis by Hiarcs 8: 1.c3 dxc3 2.Qxc3 d5 ² (0.37) Depth: 5/11 00:00:00 1.c3 dxc3 2.Qxc3 d5 ² (0.37) Depth: 5/11 00:00:00 1.c3 dxc3 2.Qxc3 d5 ² (0.37) Depth: 5/11 00:00:00 1.c3 dxc3 2.Qxc3 d5 ² (0.37) Depth: 5/11 00:00:00 1.c3 dxc3 2.Qxc3 d5 ² (0.37) Depth: 5/11 00:00:00 1.c3 dxc3 2.Qxc3 d5 ² (0.37) Depth: 5/11 00:00:00 1.c3 dxc3 2.Qxc3 d5 ² (0.37) Depth: 5/11 00:00:00 1.c3 dxc3 2.Qxc3 d5 ² (0.37) Depth: 5/11 00:00:00 1.c3 dxc3 2.Qxc3 d5 ² (0.37) Depth: 5/11 00:00:00 1.c3 dxc3 = (0.12) Depth: 5/11 00:00:00 7kN 1.c3 dxc3 2.Qxc3 d5 = (-0.13) Depth: 5/11 00:00:00 8kN 1.Rab1 Qd8 2.Rbd1 d5 3.Be2 Qxf6 4.Nxd4 ² (0.44) Depth: 5/14 00:00:00 12kN 1.Rab1 d6 2.Qf4 Be6 3.b3 Rad8 = (0.20) Depth: 6/17 00:00:00 45kN 1.Rab1 Qd8 2.Bc4 d5 3.Bb3 Be6 4.Nxd4 Qxf6 = (-0.02) Depth: 7/19 00:00:01 151kN 1.b3 Qd8 2.Bf1 Qxf6 = (0.07) Depth: 7/19 00:00:01 234kN 1.Qf4 Qxb2 2.Qh4 h5 3.Bxf5 Kg8 4.Bd3 ² (0.41) Depth: 7/21 00:00:02 321kN 1.Qf4 Qxb2 2.Qh4 h5 3.Bxf5 Kg8 4.Bd3 d6 = (0.17) Depth: 8/21 00:00:03 482kN 1.Qf4 Qxb2 ² (0.42) Depth: 9/22 00:00:07 1048kN 1.Qf4 d5 ² (0.46) Depth: 9/25 00:00:15 2040kN 1.Qf4 d5 2.Qh4 h5 3.g4 Qxb2 4.gxh5 Kg8 5.Qg5 Kh7 6.hxg6+ fxg6 ² (0.56) Depth: 10/35 00:00:38 4943kN 1.Qf4 d5 ± (0.81) Depth: 11/35 00:01:20 10460kN 1.Qf4 Qc5 2.Qh4 h5 3.Qf4 Qd5 4.Ng5+ Kg8 5.Ne4 ± (1.13) Depth: 11/35 00:02:36 19744kN 1.Qf4 Qc5 ± (1.38) Depth: 12/37 00:05:16 40113kN 1.Qf4 Qd8 2.Qh4 Rh8 3.Bc4 Kg8 +- (1.52) Depth: 12/37 00:07:56 59489kN 1.Ng5+ hxg5 2.Qxg5 Nb4 3.Bxf5 Nd5 4.Be4 Qxf6 5.Qxd5 Kg8 6.Bd3 Qb6 +- (1.61) Depth: 12/38 00:09:56 75819kN 1.Ng5+ hxg5 +- (1.86) Depth: 13/43 00:15:03 117016kN 1.Ng5+ hxg5 +- (1.86) Depth: 13/46 00:17:35 140313kN 1.Ng5+ hxg5 +- (2.11) Depth: 14/46 00:41:33 329946kN 1.Ng5+ hxg5 2.Qxg5 Nb4 3.Re5 Nxd3 4.Qh4+ Kg8 5.Rxf5 Nxb2 6.Qh6 Qxf6 7.Rxf6 d3 +- (4.52) Depth: 14/48 02:03:50 1025777kN (Athlon 4 XP1500+, 128MB hash 02.09.2002) Ernst.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.