Author: Shaun Graham
Date: 16:34:10 08/16/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 16, 1998 at 19:19:43, blass uri wrote: > >On August 16, 1998 at 16:33:33, Shaun Graham wrote: > >>These are the top 25 USCF players with Correspindence ratings and their USCF OTB >>ratings, I know for a fact that one of them is a Computer, for every single >>move. I know for a fact that another is simply a team of computer and human can >>you pick which ones they are? You'll have to guess, as it wouldn't be kosher to >>give out identities. Indeed most players are legitimate so do not be disuaded >>from playing postal chess. > >I think it is legitimate to use computers in postal chess >I think a team of computer and human can be better than one of them. Perhaps it is legitimate, i just see it as a problem in the sense, that it's hard to say "my computer suggested a move, that i hadn't thought of previously, i analysed it, thought it good then played it" The problem is that it seems a little in the grey area to say that the move played wasn't totally generated by the computer. The main culprit i'm pointing to of course in this post, is the player who makes all the computer moves, he even told me that his purpose for playing was just to test the strength of his computer. > >Is the USCF Correspondence ratings eqvivalent to the same intarnational >rating? > I'm not certain, but you can look up the rules at www.uschess.org >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.