Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 10:07:54 09/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 03, 2002 at 13:05:30, Matthew Hull wrote: It gives the reason why i took a closer statistical look at his data. In order to find what his speed penalties were for processors. Then the fraud he committed was easy to find out. >On September 03, 2002 at 12:57:38, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On September 03, 2002 at 12:54:05, Matthew Hull wrote: >> >>>Perhaps if you had a good understanding and experience of Cray architecture, >>>your statement would have more weight. But, the supercomputer you are using is >>>really very different from a Cray >> >>This has nothing whatsoever to do with whatever hardware was used. It >>has nothing to do with Vincent doing something different from Robert. > >Yes it does!!! look at the text from Vincent's post: > >"Nevertheless i worried about how to report about it. So i checked out the >article from Robert Hyatt again. Already in 1999 when i had implemented >a pc-DTS version i wondered why i never got near the speeds of bob >when i was not forward pruning other than nullmove." > >That's why Vincent is trying to discredit Bob's numbers, because Vincent can't >duplicate them. Looks obvious to me. > > >> >>The issue is the nature of the data that was presented in the DTS >>article by Robert. >> >>-- >>GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.