Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 12:04:07 09/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 03, 2002 at 14:57:58, Dana Turnmire wrote:
>"We talk about mass fraud here."
>
>Would you explain in laymen's terms what you are talking about and what the
>purpose would be for Mr. Hyatt to be lying? I'm sure many here aren't that
>knowledgable about programming.
I cannot speak for Bob, but i know that in science there is so much
fraud with 'scientific results' that you have basically 3 choices
a) lie even harder
b) get an email box filled with hatemail being honest
c) modify the conditions of your test such that your outputs look
great but only very big experts see that it wasn't that good
It is sad but true that with regard to computerchess most opt for either
'a' or 'c'.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.