Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: DTS article robert hyatt - revealing his bad math

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 12:41:05 09/03/02

Go up one level in this thread

On September 03, 2002 at 15:30:51, Matthew Hull wrote:

>There's nothing wrong with the numbers to start with.  The efficiency drop off
>up to 16 processors looks reasonable.  As for the "too perfect" numbers, it
>depends on the display software used to create the table.  Especially if one
>uses FORTRAN or some other software that though you are rounding off, it still
>wants to pad the display with zeros.

Please look at the actual data. I will post the link in a minute.

--
GCP

• Re: DTS article robert hyatt - revealing his bad math Robert Hyatt 13:12:13 09/03/02
  • Re: DTS article robert hyatt - revealing his bad math Ron Langeveld 15:38:08 09/03/02
    • Re: DTS article robert hyatt - revealing his bad math Robert Hyatt 17:19:10 09/03/02
    • I get it. Numbers can be explained by extrapolation idea. Ron Langeveld 15:46:18 09/03/02
      • Re: I get it. Numbers can be explained by extrapolation idea. Robert Hyatt 17:19:58 09/03/02
  • Impartial observer: I'm afraid this really is NOT raw data George Sobala 14:02:48 09/03/02
    • Re: Impartial observer: I'm afraid this really is NOT raw data Robert Hyatt 14:10:14 09/03/02
      • Re: Impartial observer: I'm afraid this really is NOT raw data Robert Hyatt 14:34:45 09/03/02
  • Re: DTS article robert hyatt - revealing his bad math Uri Blass 14:00:00 09/03/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.