Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 19:01:12 09/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 04, 2002 at 18:41:59, Dann Corbit wrote: >On September 04, 2002 at 17:44:27, Mike Byrne wrote: >[snip] >>>> (2) 13-> 5:27 -0.45 1. ... Re6 2. Qa3 dxe3 3. fxe3 Bxe3+ >>>> 4. Kf1 Bxd2 5. Rxd2 Nf3 6. Rf2 Ng4 >>>> 7. Rxf3 Nxh2+ 8. Kg2 Nxf3 9. Qxa7 >>> >>>The score isn't very convincing. >> >> >>No it's not, but since when do scores have to be "convincing". > >Maybe not for you, but for me they do. I have seen literally hundreds of times, >when a program chooses the right move for the wrong reasons. Fairly often, it >will reject its accidental correct choice upon deeper search. Your score >clearly shows that crafty has no idea that it is winning. 1/2 a pawn does not a >win make. The fact that it is a mere 1/100 better than a drawing move is >further evidence. A microscopic tweak of some parameter will throw it >completely off of the track. > >In this case, I think "crafty does not get it." wow , ok ...everything is ok ,I'll be right here if you need anything ...jees "crafty does not get it" ...and I guess "you do get it" ..it's ok everything will be alright ...I'm right here if you need anything ... take a pill and chill ...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.