Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Speaking of the Thesis by Marcel van Kervinck (hopefully no storms)...

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 12:47:50 09/06/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 06, 2002 at 14:45:11, Dann Corbit wrote:

>Did anyone notice his cutoff idea in the evaluation function?
>
>It seems to me to be a very good idea, and I don't know if others have tried it
>out.
>
>Basically, it consists of three modes with two early exits...
>
>1. If the material + structure score alone is dominant enough, it exits right
>away.
>2. Otherwise, it processes the piece list.  If that score is dominant, it exits.
>3. Otherwise, it does a full board control scan for all 64 squares.
>
>It is described starting on page 62 under the section "3.3.2 Multi Staged
>Design"
>He gets roughly 71% evals returning in stage #1, 13% in stage #2 and 7% in stage
>#3.
>
>It seems like it might be a big win to do it that way.


That is called "lazy evaluation".  Most of us do that.  :)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.