Author: Tony Werten
Date: 13:02:23 09/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 06, 2002 at 15:56:40, Dann Corbit wrote: >On September 06, 2002 at 15:46:53, Tony Werten wrote: >[snip] >>It's called lazy eval and is not a good idea. The times it is wrong happen to be >>the important ones. > >There must be some window wide enough to accomodate for it. Yes, but then you won't get a 71% hitrate. ( or your eval is very simplistic ie material only eval will give you a 100% hitrate ) >How about using the >idea during quiescence? Give a bit of extra energy if some red flag is raised. You get in the area of futility pruning then wich isn't very good either. Spending a bit more energy to do a full eval pays of here. FP and lazy eval together is starting to get really dangerous. Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.