Author: Omid David
Date: 16:53:48 09/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 06, 2002 at 18:40:16, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote: > >You shouldnt call an article excellent before you have implemented what it >describes or tested it etc etc, shouldnt you ? > >Else how do you really know whether the article is excellent ? I haven't expressed any idea regarding "extended futility pruning". I've called that article "excellent" considering the extent of the research Heinz has conducted. In general, I consider almost all of Heinz's papers worth the word "excellent", though I don't agree with all of them, and have some opinions which are contradicting some of his. > > >Georg > >>Speaking of window safety, the following excellent article by Ernst Heinz comes >>to mind: >> >>Extended Futility Pruning. ICCA Journal, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 75-83, June 1998. >>http://supertech.lcs.mit.edu/~heinz/ps/ext_fut.ps.gz >> >>I haven't worked enough on the extended futility pruning; but it's on my "to do" >>list.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.