Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 08:22:45 08/23/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 23, 1998 at 11:09:34, blass uri wrote: >I agree it is not fair to replay only 1 game of Rebel9 when the problem was not >a problem of 1 game. > >Uri >> >>Amir it looks obviously to me that rebel lost the game v. fritz because of no right opening-response in the given opening. A kind of trap rebel fall into. With the default book rebel is not falling in this trap. The game was replayed because it was time to do so. The fith round was not over, and the one game has not changed much. To replay all the other games would have been a different story. this would have been too much work and would have changed anything IMO. I have no problem if you call this injustice. Or unfair. For me this is not the problem: i try to make it as good as possible. Ed's request for the right book looks serious to me. He let it to my decicion what to do. I decided. (I have studied how Jaap does this !! Maybe i have learned how to behave in justice from Jaap, i think he works on an expert system for justice at his university ?! ).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.