Author: Mark Young
Date: 08:36:40 08/23/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 23, 1998 at 11:09:34, blass uri wrote: > >On August 23, 1998 at 10:30:25, Amir Ban wrote: > >>On August 23, 1998 at 08:35:34, blass uri wrote: >> >>>I think that you have different books and this is the explanation for the >>>different results for fritz5. >>>This is the only explanation I can find that the move 13...a6 was played in the >>>tournament when the chance of this move is 0% in Mark Young's book. >>>What is the reason for the difference? >>>which book was used in the ssdf games? >>> >>>Uri >> >> >>Do you guys really think this is all about books ? > >I agree that the importance of books is limited but only if they are not counter >productive. >I tried to do games between fritz5 and itself and Junior5 and itself >when white has no book and black has book and I found that white had >more than 50% after some games. >The games were played at 2 seconds per move 4 seconds per move 8 seconds per >move and 16 seconds per move. > >I think it is better to use no book for fritz5 in this tournament because >fritz5's book in this tournament is counter productive. > I agree!! With the bad lines played so far it would have been better. >> >>At this rate, this whole tournament will be replayed six times, just to make >>sure everything is ok. Incidentally, doesn't anyone here thinks that replaying >>the Fritz5-Rebel9 game was an injustice to Fritz ? I do. > >I agree it is not fair to replay only 1 game of Rebel9 when the problem was not >a problem of 1 game. > >Uri >> >>Amir
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.