Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 20:32:07 09/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 22, 2002 at 15:48:06, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >Well, you should _never_ write off Rolf as the new shooting star of CC, but >frankly, take my bets on that verdict: > >This "new" program is the new styled version of some known program of the past. > >That is the only sound explanation possible. Rolf, you suprise me a little here. Is it not more proper to say from a [ah,hem] scientific standpoint (if I may be so bold), that the possibilities are as follows: (A) it is the work of a prodigy, or (B) it is a hidden work long in the making by an eccentric, reclusive programmer, or (C) it is a funded project by a commercial software company currently in trials, or (D) it's a knock off by a faker who gets his joy in life by reading all the hubbub about himself in forums like CCC. I believe Dr. Hyatt's position is more scientifically correct if I may paraphrase, "likely not legitimate, but not impossible". Regards, :-) > >;) > >Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.