Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 08:34:39 10/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2002 at 11:26:51, Omid David wrote: slowing down the search is not the problem. the problem i explained in email to sargon >On October 04, 2002 at 11:22:05, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On October 04, 2002 at 10:34:43, Omid David wrote: >> >>had fritz implemented such a scheme it would play 300 points weaker >>anyway. > >It depends on how you implement it without slowing down the search >significantly, and that's what I'm currently working on... > >It's obvious that applying the whole heuristic on each and every node is too >expensive. But a wise application of it, could detect many draws without any >significant impact on the total speed. > >Omid. > > >> >>>Just today we had a discussion regarding the importance of blockade draw >>>detections http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?255950 >>> >>>Had Fritz implemented such a scheme, it wouldn't have stepped into the drawing >>>variation. >>> >>>My engine instantly announced draw based on its blocked-draw detection >>>heuristic. While Fritz never realized the draw... >>> >>>Omid.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.