Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 01:25:47 10/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2002 at 04:07:11, martin fierz wrote:
>On October 07, 2002 at 03:51:05, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>On October 07, 2002 at 03:11:09, Daniel Clausen wrote:
>>
>>>On October 07, 2002 at 02:53:00, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>
>>>>It could be that Kramnik only got Deep Fritz with a limited opening book and
>>>>with just a limited 2 men TB loaded before the match, and the DF team
>>>>loaded the full opening book and the 5 men TB a few minutes before the match
>>>>started.
>>>
>>>And your point is? :)
>>>
>>>Whether they gave him the 2men TBs or the 5men TBs.. I guess Kramnik couldn't
>>>care less. ;) And his team should be bright enough to get the complete 5men TBs
>>>if they really wanted...
>>>
>>>Sargon
>>
>>My point is very simple, if you provide a program a complete opening book with
>>random openings you have a good chance of having inferior opening lines from
>>players rated below 2300. That is probably why DF chose Bf8 retrieving the
>>bishop back to its original square. Not too many players rated above 2500 would
>>choose to make that silly mistake in the opening. A new limited opening book
>>made just against Kramnik could had prevented that from happening.
>>
>>Pichard.
>
>so your claiming that the inane ...Bf8 was in the opening book? that is
>ridiculous! no human would ever play this move, regardless of elo!
>
>aloha
> martin
Hi Martin,
I believe what he is trying to say is that Deep Fritz had a limited opening book
repertoir to play Kramnik and because of this limited depth of it's opening book
in some lines it had to think what to do next. This is why Deep Fritz came up
with the weak move "Bf8" as it didn't understand the position!
Regards,
Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.