Author: martin fierz
Date: 15:54:51 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 17:15:24, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On October 08, 2002 at 16:59:40, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On October 08, 2002 at 16:09:30, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>That's obvious. >>> >>>My congratualtions to ChessBase. They have done an excellent job for their baby, >>>and also an excellent job for computer chess in general. >>> >>>This is not humour, I *really* mean it. >>> >>>Life is not a zero-sum game. In real life, you can achieve a great victory even >>>if your opponent wins. >>> >>>That's exactly what's happening here. Kramnik wins. Fritz wins. Computer chess >>>wins! >>> >>> >>> >>> Christophe >> >>Absolutely! >> >>Terry > >Besides Kasparov how many players would have score 1/2 against Kasparov so far? > >NOT TOO MANY. I would almost bet you that Deep Fritz right now can beat all the >other players besides Kramnik Kasparov and Anand in a 8 games match. > >Pichard. go on, i take the bet! what about smirin, not a weak player, but far from the 3 you mentioned? he managed to beat 4 different programs (= harder to prepare) without advance information (harder again) in rapid chess (again harder) with 5-3? and if smirin can do it, what about all the other players of his strength?? and just BTW, did you look at the kramnik-DF games at all? if yes, why do you fail to see the huge weaknesses that kramnik is uncovering in DF? how come you don't believe that even an average (2500) GM couldn't exploit these after seeing these games? not with the perfection of kramnik perhaps, but a little bit like it. aloha martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.