Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 16:14:42 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 18:14:29, Christophe Theron wrote: >On October 08, 2002 at 17:15:24, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On October 08, 2002 at 16:59:40, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On October 08, 2002 at 16:09:30, Christophe Theron wrote: >>> >>>>That's obvious. >>>> >>>>My congratualtions to ChessBase. They have done an excellent job for their baby, >>>>and also an excellent job for computer chess in general. >>>> >>>>This is not humour, I *really* mean it. >>>> >>>>Life is not a zero-sum game. In real life, you can achieve a great victory even >>>>if your opponent wins. >>>> >>>>That's exactly what's happening here. Kramnik wins. Fritz wins. Computer chess >>>>wins! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Christophe >>> >>>Absolutely! >>> >>>Terry >> >>Besides Kasparov how many players would have score 1/2 against Kasparov so far? >> >>NOT TOO MANY. I would almost bet you that Deep Fritz right now can beat all the >>other players besides Kramnik Kasparov and Anand in a 8 games match. >> >>Pichard. > > > >I don't care about this. I know that you don't care about this issue at all, but if Chess Tiger was the program competing vs Kramnik you would had not responded so arrogant. Yes I know that all the parties are winner in this case. But the biggest winner from my ppoint of view is Chessbase. They have accomplished a draw so far against the second strongest human player of all times, provided that Kramnik had the original program on his posession before the match. Remember how good Chess Tiger score agaisnt the Argentinian team the first time, when they never heard of Chess Tiger before the match, and how Chess Tiger scored the 2nd time that it faced the Argentinian team. It is all a matter of exploiting the weakness of X program before the match. > >It has nothing to do with my point. > > > > Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.