Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:39:27 10/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2002 at 06:27:40, horst meyer wrote: >that's just completely wrong. deep fritz would win against deep blue >easily(maybe a score like 6-2 or higher) >deep blue has had implemented much less chess knowledge and due to that it >wasn't able to calculate the variations as deep as DF7. the IBM-team wouldn't >have been able to built a machine, that does 200 million nodes/sec, if the >algorythm had had the same amount of knowledge as fritz. >the mere result against kaspy shows nothing(he even lost against genius2 on P90) I also believe that Deep Fritz is better but you cannot use the number of nodes per second to say that machine has less knowledge. IBM had better hardware than normal pc and this is the reason that they could generate more nodes. The logic that says that they had less knowledge because they searched more nodes is wrong. Kasparov lost against Genius2.9 on p90 in 25 minutes per game. Kasparov believed during the game that he is playing against Genius2. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.