Author: Mark Loftus
Date: 09:31:25 10/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2002 at 06:27:40, horst meyer wrote: >that's just completely wrong. deep fritz would win against deep blue >easily(maybe a score like 6-2 or higher) >deep blue has had implemented much less chess knowledge and due to that it >wasn't able to calculate the variations as deep as DF7. the IBM-team wouldn't >have been able to built a machine, that does 200 million nodes/sec, if the >algorythm had had the same amount of knowledge as fritz. >the mere result against kaspy shows nothing(he even lost against genius2 on P90) That's just speculation at best. I think DB2 would beat all the best software, even now. Fritz is a fine program, one of the best, but there is no proof that Deep Fritz could defeat Deeper Blue from 1997. Their matchup in 1995 was with a different and earlier version of Deep Blue, that had connection problems during the 1995 match. Such speculation has a European flavor... Unfortunately DB has been dismantled so there can be no proof. Mark
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.