Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Clarification needed

Author: GuyHaworth

Date: 14:07:19 10/16/02

Go up one level in this thread

The Bib page merely replicates the analysis referred to by Richard Bean in
"kasparov on possible draw in game 6" ... note 'possible'.

As I understand Russian even less than chess, I'm waiting for some authoritative
comment on this 'possible draw'.

It's certainly 'up in the air' and I'm surprised that VK resigned when he did.

The 'GK' line looks better for White than that (offered earlier as a 'strawman')
produced by my 'idiot savant Fritz6_14p':  White gets R for N rather than R for
P.

From that line, it looks like the 2Rs are particularly arthritic, preoccupied by
mutual defence and not able to take the initiative.

g

• Clarification given Ingo Althofer 22:14:14 10/16/02
  • Where is Rule 8.4.3 given? Web address = ? Bob Durrett 17:11:32 10/17/02
  • Thanks GuyHaworth 00:49:19 10/17/02
  • Re: Clarification given martin fierz 22:58:54 10/16/02
    • Re: Clarification given Ingo Althofer 00:25:50 10/17/02
      • Yes, agreed GuyHaworth 03:04:32 10/17/02
    • Re: Clarification given Uri Blass 00:23:32 10/17/02
• Let me clear it up for you! Its a forced DRAW Damn i was wrong!! robert flesher 19:05:20 10/16/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.