Author: Slater Wold
Date: 23:39:17 10/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2002 at 16:18:40, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >On October 17, 2002 at 15:18:48, stuart taylor wrote: > >>Why? Because even if Kramnik wins the last game, It doesn't make it look like >>Deeper Blue was really any better than Deep Fritz. And also, it shows computers >>to be up at the top, and also gives Kasparov a big incentive to beat that result >>vs. Deep Junior. >> If the end result were 3-5 to Kramnik, it wouldn't look so close. Now it's it's >>almost a question of luck what happens in the one last game. >> The last game of Kasp.vs DB, the luck was on the DB side, because kasparov had >>just gone to the end of his nerves. >> >>Don't forget Kramnik had the program, long before, and Kramnik is probably a bit >>stronger than Kasparov VS computers. So DB already doesn't look like it was >>stronger. >>S.Taylor > >So far DF7 has not won a game, Kramnik has lost both. I have yet to see a game >where DF7 controled the game, i am not impressed. > >Regards >Jonas I'm going to have to agree with you here.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.