Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 19:32:05 10/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 21, 2002 at 11:41:41, stuart taylor wrote: >It's a non ending suspense with little satifaction gained in return for waiting >in suspence, when waiting for new programs and then waiting for their results. > >So I REALLY ask-whoever can help towards it-that ALL new engines be featured in >the next ssdf list. By "all" I mean atleast the new strong comercial engines >which normally find their way to list sooner or later. > >I would even suggest waiting an extra few days if a new thing gets released just >before the list is due out, to test that as well. Tiger 15, and not only DF 7 >but even F/DF 8 and even Junior 8, if it comes out before the publication of >results. In that case, a copy MUST be sent to ssdf and it be tested for the new >list. That's what I would like very strongly. Also the most succesful setting on >CM9K. Also, the latest Rebel. > >Normally, by the time we see a new ssdf list, we here already know almost >everything. Yes, I know it is also because we get early individual postings from >ssdf testers, but even without that we know most. And that most is always only >slight anyway. >Thanks in advance for anyone who can help! >This is an impassioned plea! Do you know how much work and time this represents? People want both new commercial and new freely available engines tested. Let's suppose we have ten engines playing at 40/2 with a minimum of a few hundred games. A bit of math will show that it takes quite a long time to do it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.