Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:38:53 10/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 25, 2002 at 15:54:00, James Swafford wrote: >On October 25, 2002 at 14:53:49, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On October 25, 2002 at 14:29:23, James Swafford wrote: >> >>>This is an interesting argument that I haven't thought of. If >>>a piece of software is sold (not necessarily by the author), is >>>it then commercial? >>> >>>I have seen Arasan on a games collection CD in Wal-Mart (or some >>>such store), but I never considered Arasan to be commercial. The >>>price was more for the "collection" than the software itself, if >>>that makes sense. >> >>If you received no money for it, then no, it's not commercial. > >You can take one of (at least) two stances: > >1. If money was paid for the software, it is commercial, regardless > of who gets the money. >2. If the author receives money for the software, it is commercial. > >Seems Vincent like definition 1. Money paid == commercial. >I think I like #2 better. > >-- >James > I agree. 1 is absolutely pointless. This is about the _author_ as he has to enter the program and pay the entry fee. > >> >>-- >>GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.