Author: Gerd Isenberg
Date: 13:42:19 11/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2002 at 14:41:57, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On November 06, 2002 at 13:19:53, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>>Probably the first 7 finishers were above the level of Crafty, even >>>more will be stronger than Comet. >> >>I think that is a _big_ stretch... IMHO of course. Based on _many_ games on >>ICC. > >I'm sure at least ChessTiger, The King, Diep and Deep Sjeng are stronger. >(Diep maybe only at slower games, I'm sure Vincent will gladly >tell us the details) > >I'm quite sure the latest Insomniac and Warp are stronger. > >I suspect IsiChess is also stronger, but I haven't seen >enough of that program to make a sound conclusion. I don't think so. May be possible with sime kind of tuning. That could be the reason, why public not availible enginges are considered stronger than Crafty. I guess, if Bob comes to some ICGA-tournaments with his latest not yet public availible version and an appropriate tournament book, things may be different. Gerd > >I don't think ICC games are good indications of strength. I >use it for debugging. I suspect many others do the same. The >tournament versions are a different matter altogether. > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.