Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The opponents were "2nd. line" engines......

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 01:37:29 11/07/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 07, 2002 at 03:58:51, Sune Fischer wrote:

>>If your quad 400 already goes 1.5Mnps, I will not claim to be able
>>to win against the quad 700. Crafty only does 750knps here, so that's
>>a large hardware advantage. I'm claiming to be stronger, not that I'm
>>sweeping the board with you no matter what the conditions...
>
>He has that parallel search overhead, so he would need to get about 25%(?) more
>nodes. If you get 750 knps and he gets 1.1 it's should actually be quite equal,
>right?

Yes. But not 1.6Mnps. I've asked Robert if he can turn on the quad 400,
so we can get an as good as equal hardware match.

>Are you still going, what was the end result?

After 20 games crafty was at +6. I'm going to play more
as I expect it to at least even out. This is good stresstesting
for the WinBoard code and the learning anyway :)

--
GCP



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.