Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is the Crafty-Sjeng match complete?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 19:50:33 11/09/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 09, 2002 at 13:39:10, Russell Reagan wrote:

>On November 09, 2002 at 11:48:09, Wayne Lowrance wrote:
>
>> I think you need to clarify this for your own image ( if that is important to
>>you).
>>Let's not leave any doubt's about your program authenticity either way. My
>>opinion only
>
>I don't think there's anything wrong with taking an idea that another program
>uses and implementing it in your own program. The question is did he copy and
>paste the code into his engine (which he said he didn't) or did he see an *idea*
>and do the implementation work himself?
>

I think this is correct.  Code from crafty won't directly port to his code
without a _lot_ of work.  So it turns out that whatever he borrows is almost
certainly "ideas" and "methodologies" only, which I don't see as a problem.


>From his response it sounds like he is borrowing ideas, not code, and isn't that
>the idea of releasing an open source engine in the first place? Ken Thompson
>said "Good programmers write great software: great programmers steal great
>software."



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.