Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:53:07 11/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2002 at 13:26:12, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On November 09, 2002 at 11:48:09, Wayne Lowrance wrote: > >>On November 09, 2002 at 04:48:36, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On November 09, 2002 at 01:08:35, Peter Kappler wrote: >>> >>>>On November 09, 2002 at 00:09:45, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>><snip> >>>> >>>>>I would expect that a match with your program would be tough. You have >>>>>repeatedly said that you copied most everything from my eval, and then >>>>>added some things on your own. >>>> >>>> >>>>If this is true, I find it extremely depressing. >>>> >>>>GCP, say it ain't so... >>> >>>Lol, it isn't. >>> >>>What I said was that when I saw a good idea in Crafty >>>that wasn't already in Sjeng, I would not hesitate to >>>'steal' it. >>> >>>I also said I know from looking at your code that there >>>aren't many things Crafty knows that Sjeng doesn't know, >>>but that the reverse isn't true. >>> >>>The above doesn't mean that I copied your eval and >>>added stuff of my own. >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >>What percentage of your eval is Dr Hyatt's in terms of performance contribution. >>Example you might say that only 10 % of the idea's are Dr Hyatts but that 10 % >>might equate to 50 % of the eval performance, or, the reverse could be the case. >> I think you need to clarify this for your own image ( if that is important to >>you). >>Let's not leave any doubt's about your program authenticity either way. My >>opinion only >>Thanks >>Wayne\ > >the knowledge in crafty is so basic and so very rude and primitif that >you cannot possibly call it 'bobs ideas'. VIncent... I had outside passed pawn code before anybody I know of. I had pawn majority code before anybody I know of except perhaps one or two commercial programs and I had this code before most commercial programs did. You can call something "basic or rude or 'primitif'" all you want. The ideas are well-grouned in sound chess and they work very well. IE for years your program has played like an absolute patzer in endings. If my ideas are "primitive" then what are yours??? > >With exception perhaps of the very asymmetrical king safety >evaluation perhaps. That's however a few lines of code, and i bet >no serious person wants to take over that. > >Instead i don't need it because my king safety is better, but i >can understand that with very primitif code in crafty it is an idea >to be afraid more for your own king than you are yourself :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.