Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:55:12 11/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2002 at 14:33:09, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On November 09, 2002 at 14:27:38, James Swafford wrote: > >I can judge it very well. it is no secret that diep's >evaluation is *huge* though :) So is the US government federal budget deficit. Doesn't mean it is "good" however... quantity != quality by any stretch. > >>On November 09, 2002 at 13:57:51, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On November 09, 2002 at 13:26:12, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On November 09, 2002 at 11:48:09, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 09, 2002 at 04:48:36, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 09, 2002 at 01:08:35, Peter Kappler wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On November 09, 2002 at 00:09:45, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I would expect that a match with your program would be tough. You have >>>>>>>>repeatedly said that you copied most everything from my eval, and then >>>>>>>>added some things on your own. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>If this is true, I find it extremely depressing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>GCP, say it ain't so... >>>>>> >>>>>>Lol, it isn't. >>>>>> >>>>>>What I said was that when I saw a good idea in Crafty >>>>>>that wasn't already in Sjeng, I would not hesitate to >>>>>>'steal' it. >>>>>> >>>>>>I also said I know from looking at your code that there >>>>>>aren't many things Crafty knows that Sjeng doesn't know, >>>>>>but that the reverse isn't true. >>>>>> >>>>>>The above doesn't mean that I copied your eval and >>>>>>added stuff of my own. >>>>>> >>>>>>-- >>>>>>GCP >>>>> >>>>>What percentage of your eval is Dr Hyatt's in terms of performance contribution. >>>>>Example you might say that only 10 % of the idea's are Dr Hyatts but that 10 % >>>>>might equate to 50 % of the eval performance, or, the reverse could be the case. >>>>> I think you need to clarify this for your own image ( if that is important to >>>>>you). >>>>>Let's not leave any doubt's about your program authenticity either way. My >>>>>opinion only >>>>>Thanks >>>>>Wayne\ >>>> >>>>the knowledge in crafty is so basic and so very rude and primitif that >>>>you cannot possibly call it 'bobs ideas'. >>> >>>I think that saying that the knowledge of another program is primitive is not >>>polite. >>> >> >>Especially when your own source code is not available to scrutinize. >> >>-- >>James >> >> >> >>>I believe that most free programs have less knowledge in their evaluation >>>relative to crafty. >>> >>>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.