Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 08:17:24 11/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 2002 at 10:32:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 11, 2002 at 05:03:42, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On November 10, 2002 at 21:14:46, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>However, I don't remember any code that "didn't work". I don't generally >>>write code that "doesn't work". I certainly might have a bug here and there, >>>or a special case that causes problems. But "didn't work"??? >> >>Different definition. >> >>An evaluation with bugs is an evaluation that doesn't work IMHO, >>because sometimes it's worse than not evaluating the thing in >>question at all. >> >>-- >>GCP > >I won't disagree. But I will say that none of my pawn code has fit that >category. It has been tested far too many different ways. Including the >test by fire of playing lots of games... > >I can always dig up the email you sent to see what kind of bug(s) you found, >but I can't imagine them being "serious"... Not to the extend that it would have been worse than not having it, no. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.