Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: endgame blunder by DeepFritz7

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 08:19:50 11/25/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 25, 2002 at 11:08:52, Terry McCracken wrote:

>On November 25, 2002 at 01:01:12, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On November 24, 2002 at 13:22:46, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>
>>>On November 24, 2002 at 10:23:38, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 23, 2002 at 19:16:23, Jay Hysenbeg wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On November 23, 2002 at 08:17:02, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On November 23, 2002 at 00:32:08, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On November 23, 2002 at 00:13:32, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On November 22, 2002 at 23:45:01, Jay Hysenbeg wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>[D]8/4p3/4Q3/8/8/k1p3PP/1q3P1K/8 w - - 0 1
>>>>>>>>>wKh2,Qe6,Pf2,g3,h3/bKa3,Qb2,Pc3,e7
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>is this a problem with my deepfritz7 or does this happen with your df7 too. mine
>>>>>>>>>fails to see that Qxe7 is a loosing line
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Is it certain Qe7 loses?  All I can see is a long series of checks and I don't
>>>>>>>see how black can find a safe haven from them to promote the pawn...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I let Crafty run a while and it says 0.00...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Bob White can't lose, I just inserted the [D] to look at the position.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It looked totally uninteresting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Terry
>>>>>chesstiger 15/14 and gambit tiger both see that Qxe7 is losing for white score
>>>>>jumps by 5 pawns
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Would you post the "losing" line?  I don't see how black can ever escape the
>>>>checks.
>>>
>>>Bob I looked at it again and it appears I really underestimated the position!
>>>
>>>After 1.Qxe7+?? ...Ka2!! going to b1 and it really goes down hill for White
>>>quickly!
>>>
>>>I should have seen this...arrghh! getting rusty...."creak"....sigh...
>>>
>>>Terry
>>>
>>>P.S. 1...Kb3 is ok I think but Ka2!! and White will have to resign, Black will
>>>get out of check and promote his pawn.
>>>
>>>Try it yourself, you'll see White starts to lose ground for grabbing the pawn.
>>>
>>>It's a tricky endgame and Fritz 7 is slower than Tiger to spot the loss.
>>>HIARCS 8, Junior 7, Shredder 6 all see a lost position but not straight away.
>>>
>>>Only Tiger spots it instantly! Bravo Christophe!
>>>
>>>
>>>Juni
>>
>>
>>I guess I am way beyond rusty, because I +still+ don't see it.  :)
>>
>>Qxe7 Ka2 (your move)
>>Qe6+
>>
>>Now what?  Kb1?  If so, I'd probalby try Qe4+ and expect c2.   Now I play
>>f4 and wait for black to try to unpin the pawn.  Ka1 Qa4 Kb1 and we dance
>>again.
>>
>>How does black make progress here?
>>
>>Note that this is human analysis, not computer analysis.  I let crafty crank
>>on it a while yesterday or whenever and it simply said 0.00 very quickly and
>>didn't change.
>>
>>I'm not sure the above is very accurate.  I didn't dwell on this for many
>>minutes, so I probably overlooked something simple, but I've generally found
>>that with a queen, a queen and pawn is usually not enough of a shelter to stop
>>the forever checks.
>>
>>I was trying to create a position where
>>
>>(1) black controls the b1-c2-d3-etc diagonal so that white can't pin the
>>pawn there;
>>
>>(2) the black king would then be at b1, and somehow checks along the b-file
>>are impossible so that a check on the 8th rank could be met by c1=Q blocking
>>the check;
>>
>>(3) I don't see how to do both, although from your comments apparently it is
>>possible or else white can be forced to a queen location where the pin along
>>the diagonal can't be played?
>
>
>Keep going!;-)
>
>Date: 25/11/2002
>White: Terry McCracken
>Black: Chess Tiger 14.0
>
>1. Qxe7+ Ka2 2. Qe6+ Kb1 3. Qe4+ c2 4. f4 Qc3 5. Qb7+
>( 5. h4 Kb2 6. Qb7+ Kc1
>( 6... Ka3 7. Qa6+ Kb4 8. Qb7+ Kc4 9. Qe4+ Kc5 10. Qe7+
>( 10. Qf5+ Kd4 11. Qf6+
>( 11. Qd7+ Ke3 )
>11... Kd3 )
>10... Kd4 11. Qd6+ Ke3 )
>)
>5... Kc1
>
>Terry
>
>Don't take the pawn! Qa6+!! Draws!
>
>Interesting posistion.  Notice 4.f4 Qc3! winning for Black.

You choose the wrong program and the wrong side.

If you claim a win then you should beat programs with black and not chess tiger
but programs that claim that it is a draw.

Note that yace did not play 4.f4 in my analysis

After 4.f4 Qc3 Yace feels bad with 4.f5 so finding Qc3 may be a good test
position

New position
[D]8/8/8/8/4QP2/2q3PP/2p4K/1k6 w - - 0 1

Analysis by Yace 0.99.56:

5.Qe4xc2+ Kb1xc2
  -+  (-5.75)   Depth: 1   00:00:00
5.f4-f5
  +-  (2.15)   Depth: 1   00:00:00
5.g3-g4
  +-  (2.18)   Depth: 1   00:00:00
5.g3-g4 Kb1-c1
  +-  (2.05)   Depth: 2   00:00:00
5.g3-g4 Qc3-d2+ 6.Kh2-g3 Kb1-c1
  +-  (2.05)   Depth: 3   00:00:00
5.g3-g4 Qc3-d2+ 6.Kh2-g3 Qd2-c3+ 7.Kg3-g2 Qc3-d2+ 8.Kg2-f1 Kb1-c1
  +-  (1.96)   Depth: 4   00:00:00
5.g3-g4 Qc3-d2+ 6.Kh2-g3 Qd2-c3+ 7.Qe4-e3 c2-c1Q 8.Kg3-g2
  +-  (1.56)   Depth: 5   00:00:00  3kN
5.g3-g4 Qc3-d2+ 6.Kh2-g1 Kb1-b2 7.Qe4-b7+ Kb2-c3 8.Qb7-c8+ Kc3-d3 9.Qc8-d7+
Kd3-e4
  +-  (1.56)   Depth: 5   00:00:00  3kN
5.g3-g4 Qc3-d2+ 6.Kh2-g3 Kb1-b2 7.Qe4-b7+ Kb2-c3 8.Qb7-c6+ Kc3-b4 9.Qc6-b6+
Kb4-a4 10.Qb6-a7+ Ka4-b4 11.Qa7-e7+ Kb4-b3 12.Qe7-b7+ Kb3-c3
  ±  (1.18)   Depth: 6   00:00:00  17kN
5.g3-g4 Qc3-d2+ 6.Kh2-g3 Kb1-b2 7.Qe4-a4 c2-c1Q 8.Kg3-h4
  ±  (0.78)   Depth: 7   00:00:00  59kN
5.g3-g4 Qc3-d2+ 6.Kh2-h1 Kb1-b2 7.Qe4-b7+ Kb2-c3 8.Qb7-c6+ Kc3-d3 9.Qc6-d6+
Kd3-e2 10.Qd6-a6+ Ke2-f3 11.Qa6-f1+ Kf3-g3 12.Qf1-g1+ Kg3xf4 13.g4-g5
  ²  (0.35)   Depth: 7   00:00:00  59kN
5.g3-g4 Qc3-d2+ 6.Kh2-g3 Kb1-b2 7.Qe4-b7+ Kb2-c3 8.Qb7-c6+ Kc3-b4 9.Qc6-b6+
Kb4-a4 10.Qb6-a7+ Ka4-b3 11.Qa7-b6+ Kb3-a4 12.Qb6-a7+ Ka4-b3 13.Qa7-b6+ Kb3-a4
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 8   00:00:00  228kN
5.g3-g4 Kb1-b2 6.Qe4-e2 Kb2-c1 7.Qe2-a6 Kc1-d2 8.Qa6-a2 Kd2-e1 9.Qa2-e6+ Ke1-d1
10.Qe6-d5+ Qc3-d2+ 11.Qd5xd2+ Kd1xd2 12.h3-h4
  =  (-0.01)   Depth: 9   00:00:01  381kN
5.f4-f5 Qc3-d2+ 6.Kh2-g1 Qd2-d1+ 7.Kg1-g2 Qd1-d2+ 8.Kg2-f1 Qd2-d1+ 9.Kf1-f2
Qd1-d2+ 10.Kf2-f1
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 9   00:00:01  381kN
5.f4-f5 Qc3-d2+ 6.Kh2-g1 Qd2-d1+ 7.Kg1-g2 Qd1-d2+ 8.Kg2-f1 Qd2-d1+ 9.Kf1-f2
Qd1-d2+ 10.Kf2-f1 Qd2-d1+ 11.Kf1-f2 Qd1-d2+ 12.Kf2-f1
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 9   00:00:01  381kN
5.f4-f5 Qc3-d2+ 6.Kh2-g1 Qd2-d1+ 7.Kg1-g2 Qd1-d2+ 8.Kg2-f1 Qd2-d1+ 9.Kf1-f2
Qd1-d2+ 10.Kf2-f1
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 10   00:00:02  799kN
5.f4-f5 Qc3-d2+ 6.Kh2-g1 Qd2-d1+ 7.Kg1-g2 Qd1-d2+ 8.Kg2-f1 Qd2-d1+ 9.Kf1-f2
Qd1-d2+ 10.Kf2-f1 Qd2-d1+ 11.Kf1-f2 Qd1-d2+ 12.Kf2-f1
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 11   00:00:04  1553kN
5.f4-f5 Kb1-a1 6.Qe4-a4+ Ka1-b2 7.Qa4-b5+ Kb2-a3 8.Qb5-a6+ Ka3-b4 9.Qa6-b7+
Kb4-c5 10.Qb7-e7+ Kc5-d4 11.Qe7-d6+ Kd4-e4 12.Qd6-f4+ Ke4-d5 13.Qf4-c1 Qc3-c4
14.Kh2-h1 Qc4-e2 15.Qc1-b2 Qe2-d1+ 16.Kh1-g2 c2-c1Q 17.Qb2xc1
  =  (-0.08)   Depth: 13   00:01:18  28681kN
5.f4-f5 Kb1-a1 6.Qe4-a4+ Ka1-b2 7.Qa4-b5+ Kb2-a3 8.Qb5-a6+ Ka3-b4 9.Qa6-b7+
Kb4-c5 10.Qb7-e7+ Kc5-d4 11.Qe7-d6+ Kd4-e4 12.Qd6-f4+ Ke4-d5 13.Qf4-c1 Qc3-c4
14.Kh2-h1 Qc4-e2 15.Qc1-b2 Qe2-d1+ 16.Kh1-g2 c2-c1Q 17.Qb2xc1 Qd1xc1 18.h3-h4
  =  (-0.08)   Depth: 13   00:02:15  50528kN
5.f4-f5 Kb1-a1 6.Qe4-a4+ Ka1-b2 7.Qa4-b5+ Kb2-a3 8.Qb5-a6+ Ka3-b4 9.Qa6-b7+
Kb4-c5 10.Qb7-e7+ Kc5-d4 11.Qe7-d6+ Kd4-e4 12.Qd6-f4+ Ke4-d5 13.Qf4-c1 Qc3-c4
14.Kh2-h1 Qc4-e4+ 15.Kh1-g1 Qe4-d4+ 16.Kg1-g2 Qd4-d1 17.Qc1-d2+ Qd1xd2+
18.Kg2-g1
  ³  (-0.48)   Depth: 14   00:02:28  55573kN
5.f4-f5 Kb1-a1 6.Qe4-a8+ Ka1-b2 7.Qa8-b7+ Kb2-a3 8.Qb7-a7+ Ka3-b4 9.Qa7-e7+
Kb4-b5 10.Qe7-e8+ Kb5-b6 11.Qe8-b8+ Kb6-c5 12.Qb8-c7+ Kc5-d4 13.Qc7-f4+ Kd4-d5
  -+  (-5.34)   Depth: 14   00:05:10  116556kN

(Blass, Tel-aviv 25.11.2002)


Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.